Persoonlijke Frequentiestaat paar 85 W Burema - R Panneman 166e plaats 42.52%
| Cafe het Zwarte Schaap, ronde 1, tafel L-4 |
|---|
| NZ tegen A Wagen - J Botma (86) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 1 | 3 nt | O | -1 | 85 | 86 | 50 | 157.0 | 79.29% |
| 2 | 1 nt | N | = | 85 | 86 | 90 | 122.0 | 61.62% |
| 3 | 1 nt | N | = | 85 | 86 | 90 | 38.0 | 19.19% |
| 4 | 3 nt | Z | -1 | 85 | 86 | -100 | 81.0 | 40.91% |
| Gemiddelde | 50.25% | | Cafe Moro, ronde 2, tafel M-4 |
|---|
| NZ tegen A Borchert - E Hoeksema (90) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 5 | 4  | N | -1 | 85 | 90 | -100 | 15.0 | 7.58% |
| 6 | 4  | O | = | 85 | 90 | -620 | 31.0 | 15.66% |
| 7 | 2 | W | = | 85 | 90 | -110 | 140.0 | 70.71% |
| 8 | 4 | W | +2 | 85 | 90 | -480 | 23.0 | 11.62% |
| Gemiddelde | 26.39% | | Cafe Weeva, ronde 3, tafel A-5 |
|---|
| NZ tegen J Mulder - T Opzeeland (94) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 9 | 4 | O | +1 | 85 | 94 | -650 | 53.0 | 26.77% |
| 10 | 4 | W | = | 85 | 94 | -620 | 111.0 | 56.06% |
| 11 | 2  | N | -1 | 85 | 94 | -50 | 81.0 | 40.91% |
| 12 | 4 | O | +2 | 85 | 94 | -480 | 98.0 | 49.49% |
| Gemiddelde | 43.31% | | Cafe Taveerne Rabenhaupt, ronde 4, tafel B-4 |
|---|
| NZ tegen N Bootsma - A Kemps (98) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 13 | 3 nt | Z | +1 | 85 | 98 | 630 | 160.0 | 80.81% |
| 14 | 3 nt | W | +1 | 85 | 98 | -430 | 70.0 | 35.35% |
| 15 | 3 | N | = | 85 | 98 | 140 | 171.0 | 86.36% |
| 16 | 4 | Z | = | 85 | 98 | 130 | 97.0 | 48.99% |
| Gemiddelde | 62.88% | | Cafe Bar 1672, ronde 5, tafel D-4 |
|---|
| OW tegen A Groenewegen - M Rijs (102) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 17 | 3 | Z | = | 102 | 85 | -110 | 6.0 | 3.03% |
| 18 | 2 nt | W | = | 102 | 85 | 120 | 144.9 | 73.18% |
| 19 | 3 nt | N | +2 | 102 | 85 | -460 | 78.0 | 39.39% |
| 20 | 3 nt | O | -1 | 102 | 85 | -100 | 6.2 | 3.13% |
| Gemiddelde | 29.68% | | Cafe Hooghoudt Proeflokaal, ronde 6, tafel E-5 |
|---|
| OW tegen J Damminga - B Damminga (106) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 21 | 2  | O | +1 | 106 | 85 | 110 | 41.9 | 21.16% |
| 22 | 4 | Z | +2 | 106 | 85 | -480 | 64.7 | 32.68% |
| 23 | 3 | N | +3 | 106 | 85 | -230 | 149.0 | 75.25% |
| 24 | 4 | O | = | 106 | 85 | 420 | 160.0 | 80.81% |
| Gemiddelde | 52.48% | | Cafe Walrus, ronde 7, tafel F-5 |
|---|
| NZ tegen E Krist - I Beijl (110) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 25 | 1 nt | Z | -2 | 85 | 110 | -100 | 23.2 | 11.72% |
| 26 | 2 | Z | +3 | 85 | 110 | 200 | 46.5 | 23.48% |
| 27 | 2 | N | -1 | 85 | 110 | -50 | 40.0 | 20.20% |
| 28 | 3 Dbl | N | = | 85 | 110 | 730 | 193.9 | 97.93% |
| Gemiddelde | 38.33% | | Cafe Mauritshuis, ronde 8, tafel G-5 |
|---|
| OW tegen T Tanja - H Wielinga (114) |
| Spel | Contract | Door | Res | NZ | OW | Score | MPS | Perc |
|---|
| 29 | 4 | N | = | 114 | 85 | -130 | 1.0 | 0.51% |
| 30 | 5 | O | -1 | 114 | 85 | -50 | 67.0 | 33.84% |
| 31 | 4 | W | = | 114 | 85 | 420 | 105.0 | 53.03% |
| 32 | NG | | | 114 | 85 | G+ | 118.8 | 60.00% |
| Gemiddelde | 36.85% |
